Palm Ridge Magistrates Court - August 16, 2024
In a dramatic bail hearing at the Palm Ridge Magistrates Court, the state is fiercely opposing the release of self-proclaimed prophet Paseka ‘Mboro’ Motsoeneng and two co-accused, all of whom face serious charges including kidnapping, malicious damage to property, and the unlawful discharge of a firearm. The case, which has garnered significant public interest, took a tense turn as the defense and state clashed over the potential release of the accused.
Motsoeneng’s Defense: Financial and Family Responsibilities
Advocate Dlamini, representing Motsoeneng, read his client’s bail affidavit into the record, stressing that Motsoeneng intends to plead not guilty to all charges. Motsoeneng emphasized his financial responsibilities, stating he has R3,000 available for bail and highlighting his need to assess damage to his Incredible Happenings Church, which was recently torched. He argued that his continued detention would adversely affect the 30 employees who rely on the church for their livelihoods.
In a bid to humanize his client, Dlamini also pointed out that Motsoeneng is the sole provider for his elderly mother and minor grandchildren, arguing that his release would be in the best interest of his family.
Confusion Over Residential Address
A significant point of contention during the proceedings was the verification of Motsoeneng’s residential address. Dlamini expressed concern over what he described as police confusion regarding the address, asserting that he had provided proof to the court. This issue raised questions about the accuracy and thoroughness of the state’s investigation.
Baloyi’s Plea: Financial Hardships and Employment Risks
The second accused, Clement Baloyi, who has worked as Motsoeneng’s bodyguard since 2010, also made a case for bail. Baloyi, who has a daughter to support, stated that he could only afford R500 for bail due to his financial burdens. He warned that his continued incarceration would result in the loss of his job, further exacerbating his family’s financial struggles.
Accused 3: A Heartbreaking Appeal
The third accused, a relative of Motsoeneng who cannot be named to protect minors involved in the case, described a heartbreaking situation in his bail affidavit. Recently widowed and left to care for three children, he implored the court to grant him bail, emphasizing that his children would be left without parental care if he remained behind bars. Like Baloyi, he stated that he could only afford R500 for bail.
The State’s Strong Opposition
State Prosecutor Vilakazi strongly opposed the bail applications, raising serious concerns about the safety of the accused and the ongoing investigation. Vilakazi revealed that two other suspects remain at large and suggested that releasing the accused could hinder efforts to locate them and the missing children allegedly involved in the incident.
The state also cited Motsoeneng’s arrest history, noting that he has been apprehended at least nine times, often providing different residential addresses. While many of these cases were eventually withdrawn, some remain under investigation, casting doubt on Motsoeneng’s reliability and posing a potential flight risk.
In Baloyi’s case, the state highlighted charges of illegal possession of a firearm and working without proper credentials, further arguing against his release. The state also mentioned Baloyi’s failure to provide his ID number, complicating their ability to profile him accurately.
Safety Concerns and Community Outrage
The state expressed concern for Motsoeneng’s safety, citing the recent arson attack on his church as evidence of the community’s anger. The Investigating Officer warned that releasing Motsoeneng could lead to further violence, potentially endangering his life.
Supporters of Motsoeneng, present in the courtroom, reacted strongly to this suggestion, underscoring the tension surrounding the case.
Defense’s Response: Allegations of Deliberate Delays
In a fiery conclusion, Advocate Dlamini accused the state of deliberately delaying proceedings and reiterated his clients’ right to bail. He urged the court to consider the personal circumstances of the accused, arguing that justice would be better served by allowing them to be released pending trial.
Awaiting the Court’s Decision
As the hearing continues, all eyes are on the Palm Ridge Magistrates Court to see whether the accused will be granted bail. The case has already sparked widespread debate, with the public eagerly awaiting the court’s decision on this high-profile matter.
Follow Us on Social Media:
- Facebook: HMR News Updates
- Instagram: @hmrnewsupdates
- Twitter/X: @hmrnewsupdates
- TikTok: @hmrnewsupdates
Contact Us:
- Website: www.hmrnewsupdates.com
- Email: info@hmrnewsupdates.com
- Phone: +27 66 427 6676
Stay ahead of the news with HMR News Updates, where the truth matters most.
